This is an outdated version published on 2026-06-19. Read the most recent version.

Simple thumb prosthesis: a cheap and useful alternative to expensive and complex solutions.

Authors

  • Andrzej Żyluk Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej i Chirurgii Ręki Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Szczecinie
  • Agnieszka Mazur-Grzesiuk Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej i Chirurgii Ręki. Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Szczecinie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21164/pomjlifesci.1044

Keywords:

thumb amputation, digital prosthesis, hand function, hand cosmesis, the DASH questionnaire

Abstract

Traumatic of oncologic amputation of the digit (digits) is fairly common injury affecting the upper extremities. Amputation of the thumb causes significant disability as loss of the thumb accounts for 40% of the entire loss of hand function. In the case of thumb amputation, replantation is the best option, allowing almost full recovery of the hand function. However, for various reasons, replantation is not always possible or successful and in these cases other methods of thumb reconstruction such as toe-to-thumb transfer, lengthening procedures and index pollicization are considered. Other, reasonable option is use of various prostheses such as naked prostheses, vacuum-retained prostheses, or osteo-integrated prostheses. In the article we present a case of young men who underwent amputation of the distal phalanx of his thumb in right (dominant) hand due to malignant tumour. He had relatively long stump of the digit and he found in the internet simple thumb prostheses made of rubber material, which were advertised as stage props and toys used to depict magic tricks. Total cost of the prosthesis was 20 PLN. He started using it in his daily activities and at work. At follow-up at 3 months after amputation the patient filled the DASH questionnaire and  obtained score of 8 points, indicating normal hand function, both with and without the prosthesis. However, in the subscale “professional activity” the difference of 4 points appeared, favouring using a prosthesis. The patient reported also that use of prosthesis  allows him to tie laces in his shoes, fasten clothes buttons and use scissors more efficiently. The patient believes that this simple prosthesis makes for him easier performing activities of daily living and professional work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Żyluk A. Replantacje kończyny górnej. In: Żyluk A, editor. Chirurgia ręki. Warszawa: Medipage; 2017. P. 657-78.

Atroshi I, Rosberg HE. Epidemiology of amputations and severe injuries of the hand. Hand Clin 2001;17:343‑50.

Żyluk A. Ten-year (2010–2019) activity report of the Replantation Service for hand amputations in Poland. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2023;55(1):41-6.

Heitmann C, Levin LS. Alternatives to thumb replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110(6):1492-503.

Willy C, Krettek C. Transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthesis (TOP) after limb amputation : Status quo and perspectives. Unfallchirurg 2017;120(5):395-402.

Bregoli C, Biffi CA, Morellato K, Gruppioni E, Primavera M, Rampoldi M, et al. Osseo integrated metallic implants for finger amputees: a review of the literature. Orthop Surg 2022;14(6):1019-33.

Li Y, Kulbacka-Ortiz K, Caine-Winterberger K, Branemark R. Thumb amputations treated with osseointegrated percutaneous prostheses with up to 25 years of follow-up. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2019;3(1):e097.

Dias Caldeira FI, Nascimento VA, da Silva Gasque KC, Haddad MF. Use of silicone finger prostheses in amputee patients: An integrative review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2021;21(4):339-47.

Pilley MJ, Quinton DN. Digital prostheses for single finger amputations. J Hand Surg Br 1999;24(5):539-41.

Pereira BP, Kour AK, Leow EL, Pho RW. Benefits and use of digital prostheses. J Hand Surg Am 1996;21(2):222-8.

Kuret Z, Burger H, Vidmar G, Maver T. Adjustment to finger amputation and silicone finger prosthesis use. Disabil Rehabil 2019;41:1307‑12.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

Versions

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>